Photo Exploration: Rock and Snow

April 16, 2013 at 11:36 am

I have acquired a new respect for cold weath­er pho­tog­ra­phy. I may have got­ten in over my expe­ri­ence lev­el ear­li­er this year with an excur­sion with Karl Abbott out to Max Patch. We expect­ed the weath­er to be a bit of snow in the ear­ly morn­ing but clear by 9am. What we did­n’t plan on was end­ing up get­ting stuck, unable to get the vehi­cle out, and hav­ing to be dri­ven down by offi­cials. An inter­est­ing time and it proved to me how utter­ly unpre­pared I often am for chang­ing weath­er conditions. 

How­ev­er! This post isn’t about my mis­ad­ven­tures. This is about this image and the how/why I took it.
Rock and Snow
I know I spot metered for the rocky parts, those were def­i­nite­ly the dark­est parts that I want­ed to check, but at my dis­tance I was still get­ting inter­fer­ence from the snow in the meter. So I metered down a full stop. That gave my dark­est darks a bit con­trast and helped alle­vi­ate the ten­den­cy of snow to blow out all the highlights.

The focus­ing was pret­ty sim­ple, even with the over­cast day it was still bright enough to do a 1/250 sec­ond at f/11 or so. With that large of a depth of field, I could assured­ly get every­thing in focus from about 20 feet onwards, using hyper­fo­cal tech­nique and my lens markings.

A quick aside on hyper­fo­cal tech­nique: when you focus a spot X (say 10 feet away) then, depend­ing on the aper­ture, you have space clos­er and fur­ther away from X in focus as well. By stop­ping down your lens, you can increase the amount of that dis­tance in focus (also called the DOF — depth of field). Because of the physics of optics, you can cal­cu­late what dis­tance you have to focus to have for EVERYTHING behind that dis­tance be in focus — all the way out to infin­i­ty. This is why lens­es have a lit­tle infin­i­ty sym­bol on them — it basi­cal­ly means “every­thing from here on out is in focus”. How­ev­er, you don’t have to place your focal point at infin­i­ty to have the DOF reach to infin­i­ty. The “hyper­fo­cal” point is the place where every­thing will be in focus behind it (and a good bit in front of it). You don’t have to actu­al­ly cal­cu­late the dis­tance, you can just man­u­al­ly place the infin­i­ty sym­bol on the lens on the “out­er” f/stop on your lens. That guar­an­tees that every­thing between two f/stop mark­ings will be in focus, includ­ing the dis­tance out to infin­i­ty. There are lots of great arti­cles out there on hyper­fo­cal focus­ing — http://www.dofmaster.com/hyperfocal.html is a good write­up, and http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html is a cal­cu­la­tor that lets you cal­cu­late the hyper­fo­cal dis­tance for any lens/aperture com­bi­na­tion. It’s a some­what com­pli­cat­ed expla­na­tion for a sim­ple-in-prac­tice tech­nique — but it is a very handy tool when there isn’t time to focus on a spe­cif­ic point, and it also saves time when you know you want an extreme­ly large depth of field.

I was real­ly tak­en with the three tex­tures in this scene. There is the soft pow­der in the low­er left, then mov­ing to the sol­id rock with ice and packed snow, and final­ly the wisps of trees and what pre­cip­i­ta­tion can adhere to their branch­es. I imag­ine the sheer face of the rock chal­leng­ing the weath­er to try and hide, to try and cov­er up and blank out the exis­tence of what is always below. Snow can make every­thing even, make it all the same and con­sis­tent. But this rock face is respond­ing with a nega­tion of that effort. It reminds me that no mat­ter how deep the pow­der and how thick the snow­fall, there is always our sol­id earth under our feet.